Archive
Categories

Euro Crisis: „A Flood of Inflation“

[Original title: „Prof. Markus Kerber zur Eurokrise: ‚Ein Schwall von Inflation‘„, in korrektheiten.com, January 14, 2012. Translation by MKH]

The Deutschlandfunk (DLF, a public German radio station) has aired, Friday night, an interview with Professor Markus Kerber. Kerber is an economist at the Technische Universität Berlin. He conducts research on public finance and economic policy. The occasion was the downgrading of the creditworthiness of France from AAA to AA + by the rating agency Standard & Poors. It was about the impact on the Euro. Kerber was speaking in plain language. He said among other things:

In total, Germany can try in this situation only one thing: withdraw from the Euro rescue fund – at least from the Euro rescue fund – to secure its rating and to save [herself]. Otherwise, in the near future the conclusions from Germany’s liability-causing situation will have to be drawn. Germany will have to be liable for all, and this necessarily leads to a serious downgrade. The bailout funds …

Question: That means, if I understand you correctly, that the bailout fund has now become history?

This is the beginning of the end of the bailout. Due to the liability of France, at least in the medium term the bailout fund cannot obtain financing on the terms that are necessary to fund the financially distressed countries.

Question: But is the situation so explosive, can we assume that interest rates now are going to rise dramatically in the countries that have been downgraded?

This depends on whether in these countries a radical austerity is now announced and carried out. So far we have just a declaratory policy. But even if it were announced, it would actually have to be implemented. We are in the maelstrom of a pan-European financial crisis, and Germany can escape this maelstrom only by escaping quickly from the Euro rescue fund, and by making clear that she is no longer prepared to take the liability and responsibility for the stabilization of the completely rotten states. Finally, the taboo has to be broken that the Euro zone is viable as such; Germany needs today more than ever a plan B to abruptly leave the Euro zone, together with the other trade surplus countries like the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Finland and Austria.

Question: You are speaking clearly as a Euro skeptic. How will the ECB, the European Central Bank …

… not a Euro skeptic, but a pro-European. Those who don’t want Europe, European integration and the European single market to be longer burdened with the religion-like Euro project, have to draw conclusions from the actual situation: conclusions that politicians are not ready to draw, because they are responsible for this policy and the current situation.

Question: But how will the ECB, the European Central Bank respond? Are you worried that they will start the printing press?

This is already under way: Mr. Draghi has, on the one hand, declared that the European Central Bank cannot run fiscal policy through bond purchases, but the ECB has, on the other hand, facilitated the security requirements for the refinancing of banks in a way that banks in the Euro area now can submit ANY paper to refinance. This is somewhat simplified, but it’s true in the trend. The result: Of the 489 billion € banks have retrieved, Italian banks alone have retrieved 116 billion. But the call to use the ECB as fiscal firefighters will even become louder, and this means, economically, exactly what you have just said: that the printing press is started, and then, after a delay, a flood of inflation will swamp us.

[Questions asked by Oliver Ramme. The interview is available on the following URL for some time: http://ondemand-mp3.dradio.de/file/dradio/2012/01/13/dlf_20120113_2315_1784255d.mp3]

Who is Delegitimizing Israel?

by Manfred Kleine-Hartlage

[Original title: „Wer delegitimiert Israel?“, July 6, 2011, in korrektheiten.com; translation by the author]

On July 11, 2011, the Jewish Forum for Democracy and against anti-Semitism organized a discussion meeting with the journalist Ulrich Sahm in Berlin. The title of the event was:

Current forms of hostility Israel: Boycott – blockade runners – mass rush to the borders – Unilateral proclamation of a palestinian State

The organizers outline the issue as follows:

„Classical“ wars are no longer fashionable. The Palestinian intifada and suicide bombings are „working“ no longer as intended. Fence, wall and other Israeli measures have an effect. Therefore, „warfare“ has been replaced by „lawfare“. The struggle against Israel is „fought“ in universities, the Internet, in the UN and in other ways on a global level. This unarmed struggle is intended to delegitimize Israel, damage its economy through boycotts, and to roll over Israel’s borders with mass rallies.

This is obviously the case. The Arab-Islamic strategy to encircle and cut off Israel from its lifelines had to remain toothless as long as only the Islamic world itself was committed to it, whereas it would become a mortal threat to Israel if Europe supported it, and indeed the Muslim infiltration strategy in Europe is aiming not least at achieving just that.

There is no effective defense against these forms of struggle against Israel. (…) For the existence of Israel and the prestige of the state even among „good friends“ and „allies“, this sophisticated propaganda war is a real danger, to which Israel is exposed almost helplessly.

This, too, is correct. The question, however, is: Why is there no defense? Why is it possible to delegitimize Israel and organize boycotts?

What is Israel doing that is considered so terrible? It maintains a powerful fighting army („Militarism“!), it is welcoming only immigrants belonging to its own people („Racism!“), has built a fence to lock out potential terrorists from its own national territory („Apartheid !“), and refuses to allow the immigration of millions of Muslims („Islamophobia“).

In short, Israel’s policy aims at preserving the political, ethnic, religious and cultural identity of the own nation, and is answered with exactly the same defamatory demagogic slogans Europeans with similar political views have to face. The principles underlying these policies are exactly the ones Europeans are expected to (and made) refuse, and which are supported by a tsunami of globalist, multiculturalist, liberal, and pacifist propaganda, re-education, and brainwashing. The result with regard to Israel is as I described it in a letter to my Israeli fellow blogger Lila:

You are rightly complaining that the Germans, and even more so other European nations, have too little understanding for your situation and give you advice whose realization would be tantamount to national suicide for Israel. Now I ask you: Our own nation is committed to a morbide policy of self-dissolution and self-destruction – how can you expect such a nation to have an understanding of another that is fighting for its existence? How can you expect a nation that is deliberately destroying the German character of Germany (and even believes this to be an expression of particularly high moral standards) to support a policy that aims at preserving the Jewish character of Israel? And why should nations who open their own countries to Muslim mass immigration agree with you when you deny the Palestinians‘ „right to return“, rather than to embrace them to play multiculti with them?

The propaganda, the boycott calls, the delegitimization strategy of the Palestinians against Israel could never work if the nations of Europe had not been trained to regard the consolidation of Western nations as something „evil“, and to abandon – for fear of the „Nazi bludgeon“ – their existential self-interest. Anyone committed to and propagating this kind of training is actively delegitimizing Israel.

Under these circumstances, it ought to be a surprise that – not only, but not least – just Jewish organizations are promoting this ideology in a particularly committed manner, and that they are using the bludgeon mentioned with particular frequency and aggressiveness against dissidents. (Let’s just remember, as one example of many, how the well-known Jewish representative Michel Friedman, like a North Korean show trial prosecutor, tried to push Thilo Sarrazin into the Nazi corner during a TV debate, just because he had rightly warned that Germany is abolishing herself. The obvious conclusion is that Friedman simply wants Germany to abolish herself.) There are a lot of major Jewish organizations actively promoting multiculturalism and mass immigration, although mass immigration in Europe means immigration of millions of Muslims, and although they cannot have an illusion that not only complete islamization, but even just the existence of merely a substantial Muslim voters block would force European governments to engage in an anti-Israeli policy and to join the boycott policy suggested by the Muslims, ultimately throttling Israel.

Maybe these people don’t deliberately intend to undermine Israel, but when in doubt they accept its destruction rather than accepting strong gentile nations. Anti-Semites tend to blame the Jews and Jewish organizations for being loyal primarily to Israel. This is obviously a false perception, and we would be better off if it was true. The emotional (and, as it seems, rather superficial) sympathy of Jews for Israel notwithstanding, most of them are by no means commited Zionists. Their sympathy for Israel seems to be limited by what they believe to be their interest as a Jewish minority in Europe and America, and, given the actual anti-White and anti-national bias of their policies, they would rather betray Israel’s interest than give up their destructive policy towards the white nations. (There is even a minority of mostly Leftist Jews actively condemning and fighting Zionism just because they entirely reject the very concept of the nation-state and don’t want their utopian globalist views to be compromised by considering the interest of any nation, and be it a Jewish one.) Whatever lip-service they spend or even true emotional ties to Israel there may be: They have made the choice not to sacrifice their petty, narrow-minded, and destructive minority strategy, but rather to sacrifice Israel. As a collateral damage, so to speak.

Germany Attempts to Silence Criticism of Islam

by Soeren Kern

[Though this article is not drawn from the German blogosphere, it provides correct information on the situation of the counterjihad movement in Germany. Soeren Kern is Senior Fellow for Transatlantic Relations at the mainstream conservative Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos, Madrid.] 

German authorities have officially confirmed that they are monitoring German-language Internet websites that are critical of Muslim immigration and the Islamization of Europe.

According to Manfred Murck, director of the Hamburg branch of the German domestic intelligence agency, the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV), his organization is studying whether German citizens who criticize Muslims and Islam on the Internet are fomenting hate and are thus criminally guilty of „breaching“ the German constitution.

The BfV’s move marks a significant setback for the exercise of free speech in Germany and comes amid a months-long smear campaign led by a triple alliance of leftwing German multicultural elites, sundry Muslim groups and members of the mainstream media, who have been relentless in their efforts to discredit the so-called counter-jihad movement (also known as the „Islamophobes“) in Germany.

Opinion polls show that growing numbers of ordinary German citizens are worried about the consequences of decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged mass immigration from Muslim countries.

Germans are especially concerned about the refusal of millions of Muslim immigrants to integrate into German society, as well as the emergence of a parallel legal system in Germany based on Islamic Sharia law.

In an effort to reverse this tide of public opinion, the guardians of German multiculturalism have been working overtime to regain the initiative by accusing the critics of Islam of engaging in hate speech to try to intimidate the so-called „new right“ into silence. […]

[Read full article on stonegateinstitute.org]

A Friday Sermon

MEMRI (Middle East Media Resaerch Institute) has issued a video and a translation of excerpts from a Friday sermon delivered by Egyptian cleric Ali Abu Al-Hasan, which aired on Al-Hekma TV on January 6, 2012:

Ali Abu Al-Hasan:

With the [Muslim] emigration [to Europe], and the unwillingness to get married and have children [among the Europeans]… A hundred of people there are succeeded by eighty, and ten years later, those eighty will be succeeded by sixty, and those sixty will later be succeeded by forty, and those forty will become ten a decade later, and twenty years later, not a single one of them will be left!

Europe has realized this. After a while, Europe will become a single Islamic state, which will know nothing but „There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is His Messenger.“ This will happen whether they like it or not. This is the decree of Allah. Islam is coming!

Mass Murderer Napoleon Bonaparte

by Kewil

[Kewil is well known in the German blogosphere as an anti-Left polemicist. The following article, originally dated January 16, 2011, has now been re-published by As der Schwerter. Translation by Manfred Kleine-Hartlage]

Hitherto, military science has not yet drawn a detailed balance of the Napoleonic wars. It is estimated that five million people died, ten million were wounded. Perhaps there were more, maybe less, in any case the numbers would quadruple if one put them into relation to current demographic conditions. The whole continent was hurt by them, and in all classes there was reason to mourn.

What is striking about it is the indifference and persistent glorification of this war criminal, whose picture is still hanging in many French salons. Even more, our red vermin worship him as someone who had brought „Enlightenment“ to Germany and liberated us from the priest – which was manifested by French troops who made the Mainz and Magdeburg Cathedrals horse stables and let their horses shit in the churches of the country. Not to mention millions who had been robbed, subject to forced conscription, raped, deported, slain and wounded, and who would certainly would have liked to avoid this kind of „Enlightenment.“ Long time ago and history?

No, protest! These atrocities are in fact the more shocking, as every day stupid atheists, red Multikultis and Islamic submarines fire outraged salvoes against Christian Crusades, witch burnings and the Inquisition, dating much earlier than Napoleon, but apparently not yet „mere history“ because justifying the permanent and daily denigration of the Church – though the state, not the Church, was responsible for Inquisition as well as witch burnings!

The usual leftist double standards! Colonizers like Lüderitz and Peters or generals like Hindenburg are made unpersons by renaming streets with their name! But Napoleon? A saint of the Left!

Well, the Aristoes have always been international …

by Le Penseur

[Due to my permanent lack of time, I have been neglecting this blog for a few months. I am now starting again with an article of Le Penseur, a sharp-tongued libertarian Austrian blogger. Original title: „Jo, die Aristos san halt seit jeher international“, published a few hours ago.]

Well, the Aristoes have always been international, and so the high princely foreign minister of Czechia, Karl („Kari“) Schwarzenberg, threatens with his resignation from the government, if Prime Minister Petr Necas does not sign the proposed „fiscal pact“ [subjecting EU member states to centralized control of their budgets]. His reason is quoted by „Die Presse“ as follows:

I will not sit in a government that will lead the Czech Republic outside the mainstream of European integration. We have a vital interest in sitting at the table and participate in major decisions that affect us strongly.

Nice words – but they mean in plain English nothing but to let the sovereignty of our state and the democratic legitimacy of our budget go West, in order to be the seventh dwarf from left in Brussels, together with other, equally powerless EU dwarves who fiddle with the Eurocrats – because those who belong to their network cannot be voted out, but those who have fallen in disgrace (see Hungary), are forced to their knees by extortion.

Well, his Highness could have miscalculated. President Klaus has already announced that he will not approve this centralization pact. While Klaus is unfortunately a chauvinist hardliner and completely unrepentant with regard to the unspeakable crimes that were committed in the expulsion of Sudeten Germans by the Czechs, he is, on the other hand, a politician to envy the Czechs! Compared with the vermin that mans our government and Parliament benches …

Martin Lichtmesz on Germany’s Colonization

Martin Lichtmesz, one of Germany’s best political essayists (whose essays I haven’t translated until now, as his German is so brilliant that you would have to be Shakespeare to translate it in adequate English), has published a new book: „Die Verteidigung des Eigenen“, dealing with the ideology behind Germany’s self-destruction.

I want to give at least a short quotation from it: Having dealt with Frantz Fanon’s criticism of colonization and colonialism, in which the author’s the reference to  his own nègrerie („negroness“), i.e. his awareness of racial identity and its importance for freedom and self-determination plays a major role, Martin draws a parallel to the German situation, to the arrogant attitude of the West and the self-denying masochism of many Germans:

Of course, the German was, since 1945, something like the Negro of Europe, who had to be weaned from his barbarism, to incorporate him into the community of civilized nations, a task which the carriers of the „burden of liberalism“ had borne heroically, as was (and is) their job. We thank them today in Washington and Moscow for the fact that they have slain the dragon, who we once were ourselves. But the forcibly (by Versailles and Dresden) democratized Germans cannot be trusted, for you never know whether, under the cosmopolitan mask, there is still the old black jungle negroe, now simply called a Nazi, who – like once the just seemingly romanized Arminius – is just waiting for the opportunity to pull out his ax again. This provides the practical pretext to keep the nose ring always at hand. The historical consciousness of the Germans is deliberately grouped around their Negro past. The intention is not so much to make them cease to be Negroes and never return to their negroness, but rather to remind them that, due to their latent negroness, they need permanent educational supervision.

Λιβύη: Δράση ενάντια στο Σαρκοζί για «τα εγκλήματα ενάντια στην ανθρωπότητα» στον τρόπο

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. Η αυτόματη μετάφραση. Δεν φέρουμε καμία ευθύνη για μεταφραστικά λάθη.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

από Friederike Beck

Αρχικός τίτλος Libyen: Auf Menschlichkeit κύβων gegen Verbrechen wegen „του Σαρκοζί gegen Klage «DEM Weg, που δημοσιεύεται στις 26 Σεπτεμβρίου 2011, σε Friederikes Becklog

Μετάφραση από Google, που αναθεωρείται από MKH

[Friederike Beck είναι μεταξύ των πιό ταλαντούχων δημοσιογράφων της Γερμανίας. Ο guttenberg-φάκελος βιβλίων της DAS (το αρχείο Guttenberg), που εξετάζει τα υπερατλαντικά δίκτυα της επιρροής, έχει εκδοθεί νωρίτερα σε αυτό το έτος. Είναι κανονικός αρθρογράφος του περιοδικού Zeitgeist, κρίσιμο περιοδικό για το heretics και free-thinkers, που προκαλούν τις καθιερωμένες επικρατούσες απόψεις.]

Μακριά από τα γερμανικά μέσα το επίκεντρο τρεις των πιό σεβαστών δικηγόρων στη Γαλλία προετοιμάζει μια καταγγελία για τα εγκλήματα ενάντια στην ανθρωπότητα πριν από τα γαλλικά δικαστήρια. Θα αντιπροσωπεύσουν τα συμφέροντα των θυμάτων του τρέχοντος βομβαρδισμού του ΝΑΤΟ στη Λιβύη. Κατηγορούμενος: Νικολά Σαρκοζί.

Οι δικηγόροι δεν είναι κανένας λιγότερο από τον πρώην γαλλικό ξένο Υπουργό Roland Dumas, ο εξαιρετικά εύγλωττος Marcel Ceccaldi, και ο διάσημος και πασίγνωστος Michel Vergès.

Dumas είναι επίσης πρόθυμο να υπερασπίσει Muammar Gaddafi ενώπιον του διεθνούς Ποινικού Δικαστηρίου στη Χάγη, η οποία έχει εκδώσει ένα διεθνές ένταλμα σύλληψης ενάντια στο δικτάτορα. Είπε: «Εάν τον βρούν, θα τον σκοτώσουν όπως το Bin Laden. Μερικά κράτη σφετερίζονται τώρα το δικαίωμα να σκοτώσουν – ενάντια σε κάθε διεθνές δίκαιο. »

Ο πληρεξούσιος Vergès, γεννημένο στο Βιετνάμ και το γιο μιας βιετναμέζικης γυναίκας και ενός Γάλλου υπενθυμίζει την εφαρμογή του πορτοκαλιού πρακτόρων από τα ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΙΚΑ στρατεύματα κατά τη διάρκεια του πολέμου του Βιετνάμ και του γεγονότος ότι το ΝΑΤΟ έχει χρησιμοποιήσει για τους μήνες ακόμη και τις κεφαλές πυραύλου που περιέχουν το μειωμένο ουράνιο – μια ανησυχητική σύγκριση!

88χρονο Dumas (υπουργός Εξωτερικών κάτω από Mitterand) ήταν μαζί με Vergès το Μάιο στην Τρίπολη. Έκαναν την επαφή με τα θύματα και τους επιζόντες των επιθέσεων του ΝΑΤΟ, των οποίων 30 διένειμαν μια εξουσιοδότηση στους δικηγόρους.

Το αιχμηρός-τονισμένο Ceccaldi ανέφερε ότι ο βομβαρδισμός είχε χτυπήσει τη δύναμη, το νερό και άλλες εγκαταστάσεις ανεφοδιασμού και επισημαίνει: «Μετά από πέντε μήνες καθημερινά να βομβαρδίσει από το ΝΑΤΟ και χιλιάδες νεκροί άνθρωποι θα σταματήσει το καθεστώς – απλά επειδή δεν στέκονται την κατάσταση άλλο. »

Το Ceccaldi υποβάλλει μια άλλη ενδιαφέρουσα πτυχή: Το δυτικό leadershave έχασε το νήμα τους λόγω της πρώτης σοβαρής πρόκλησης που αναφέρεται στη Λιβύη. «Εάν σταματούν τις δίκες που παρουσιάζονται στο δικαστήριο, αυτά θα είναι στοιχεία μια για πάντα ότι η δυτική δικαιοσύνη δεν κυβερνιέται από το νόμο, αλλά από τους πολιτικούς -. »

Το ICC στη Χάγη απολαμβάνει λίγο γόητρο εκτός της Ευρώπης, δεδομένου ότι έχει ασχοληθεί μέχρι τώρα μόνο με Αφρικανούς. Το άσπρο Λα παραβατών à Τόνι Μπλερ, Τζορτζ Μπους, Dick Cheney και Donald Rumsfield δεν είναι εκεί ένα ζήτημα.

Ο γαλλικός πρώην-ξένος υπουργός δήλωσε επίσης ότι «εξεπλάγη ότι αυτή η αποστολή (του ΝΑΤΟ), που είχε αρχίσει για να προστατεύει τους πολίτες, είναι έτοιμη να σκοτώσει τους.» Περιγράφηκε ως «βάναυση επιθετικότητα ενάντια σε μια κυρίαρχη χώρα».
Ο Michel Vergès επίσης δεν διέθεσε την κριτική, που καλεί τις χώρες της ατλαντικής συμμαχίας» δολοφόνοι». Το «γαλλικό κράτος», σύμφωνα με τον, «οργανώνεται από τους κακοποιούς και τους δολοφόνους. Θα σχίσουμε κάτω από τον τοίχο της σιωπής «.

***
Τα elites στο Σαρκοζί-έδαφος, ένας από τους κύριους δράστες στον πόλεμο της επιθετικότητας ενάντια στη Λιβύη, στέκονται προφανώς όχι εντελώς ενωμένα πίσω από τον πρωθυπουργό τους. Ο πόλεμος στη Λιβύη ακόμη και ατημέλητα καλείται «Λα guerre Σαρκοζί BHL contre Kadhafi».

BHL (= επιβολή του Bernard Henry), ο εκατομμυριούχος, ο φιλόσοφος και το πολιτικό ενεργό στέλεχος, διοργάνωσαν τις πρώτες συζητήσεις με τους «αρχηγούς των επαναστατών» ως είδος υπουργού Εξωτερικών υποκατάστατων σε μια ειδική αποστολή σε Benghazi – εκ μέρους ποιου. Συμβούλεψε το Σαρκοζί για να αναγνωρίσει επίσημα το επαναστατικό συμβούλιο, το οποίο έκανε στο 03/10/2011 – χωρίς τον πραγματικό γαλλικό υπουργό Εξωτερικών Juppé που ενημερώνεται – τα τελευταία λέγεται για να έχει αισθανθεί επιπληγμένος.

***
Ο βομβαρδισμός μιας χώρας χωρίς οποιαδήποτε σημαντική αεροπορική άμυνα είναι δειλός και αποστροφή. Η πολιτική κατηγορία της Γερμανίας που Westerwelle μια δήλωση του σεβασμού και μια ταπεινή πίστη στο ΝΑΤΟ λόγω του επιτυχούς βομβαρδισμού Λιβύης της τώρα προφανώς έχει κάνει την ειρήνη της με τις στρατιωτικές «λύσεις».

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

Φιλελεύθερη και συντηρητική κριτική του Ισλάμ

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. Η αυτόματη μετάφραση. Δεν φέρουμε καμία ευθύνη για μεταφραστικά λάθη.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

Ένα κείμενο που δημοσιεύεται αρχικά στα γερμανικά στο pi-news.net («Liberale und konservative Islamkritik»), δίνοντας έμφαση στο ιδεολογικό χάσμα μεταξύ των δύο φτερών της αντι-ισλαμικής μετακίνησης στην Ευρώπη, και υποστηρίζοντας μια πιό συντηρητική κριτική του Ισλάμ.

Ελπίζω ότι οι εγγενείς αγγλικοί ομιλητές θα συγχωρήσουν τα πολλά λάθη στη μετάφραση. Θα μπορούσα να τους έχω αποφύγει με πρώτα να γράψω κάτω τη μετάφραση, διαβάζοντας έπειτα έξω. Αλλά αυτό είναι ένα βίντεο, και σκόπευα να συντηρήσω τον προφορικό χαρακτήρα του.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

Γιατί η «έξυπνη υπεράσπιση» είναι το αντίθετο της έξυπνης υπεράσπισης

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. Η αυτόματη μετάφραση. Δεν φέρουμε καμία ευθύνη για μεταφραστικά λάθη.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

από Skeptizissimus, στις 10 Οκτωβρίου 2011, μετάφραση από Google

Καταρχήν: η υπεράσπιση είναι πιθανώς η σημαντικότερη προϋπόθεση για την αδιαφιλονίκητη κυριαρχία μιας χώρας. Και η κυριαρχία στο διεθνείς νόμο και το κρατικό νόμο περιλαμβάνει την ακεραιότητα του εθνικού εδάφους και τις αποφάσεις της κυβέρνησης.

Εκείνοι που έχουν σώσει επάνω κάποια ελάχιστη υπόλοιπη συμπόνοια για την ομοσπονδιακή Δημοκρατία και ίσως ακόμη και κρυφά ελπίζουν ότι τα μέσα δεν συμβαδίζουν σαν από μια αόρατη δύναμη, μπορεί, με το νέο αλγόριθμο αναζήτησης Google, να ψάξει για τον όρο «έξυπνη υπεράσπιση». Έκπληξη! Κανένας German-language σταθμός εφημερίδων ή τηλεόρασης δεν υπέβαλε έκθεση σχετικά με τα αποτελέσματα της υπογραφής της διάσκεψης των Βρυξελλών των αμυντικών υπουργών του ΝΑΤΟ.

Χάρι στην ημι-κυβέρνηση ρωσικό Ria-Novosti, υπάρχει ευτυχώς μια μικρή διευκρίνιση:

Πάλι, ένα κομμάτι της υπόλοιπης υπόλοιπης κυριαρχίας της Γερμανίας και όλων των κρατών μελών διαβρώνεται. Η υπεράσπιση του ΝΑΤΟ πρόκειται να γίνει στον τομέα του εξοπλισμού «αποδοτικότερου».

[Διαβασμένος περισσότεροι…]

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »